The eventual spilling of Russia’s war of aggression against neighboring Ukraine over its current borders, including to the Republic of Moldova, generates serious concern. History shows, by the conclusions of chroniclers, that Moldova had almost always been on the path of “evil things”. Moreover, chronicler Grigore Ureche said that “the evil things” are not something abstract and general, but are something very concrete and real. According to him, the “the evil things” are the wars waged by foreign forces on this territory. The experts invited to IPN’s public debate ”Fate of peripheries of empires. Quo vadis, Moldova?” discussed the impact the imperial wars that took place on our territory had on historical and current Moldova and the reasons why Moldova had almost always been on the path of these evil wars.
The standing expert of IPN’s project Igor Boțan said the empires are state constructs led by emperors or are colonial powers with international importance, which are based on the domination of a military caste in their internal and external politics and act in the interests of the military caste. “As a rule, an empire unites different nations and territories into a single state with one political center that plays a prominent role in the region and even in the whole world,” stated the expert.
Igor Boțan noted that the imperial wars represent a modus vivendi for empires and are based on what is called imperial conscience that represents a holistic or integral complex. It includes different ideas, concepts, feelings that form part of the public conscience, ideas about the place of the given state in the world and in history. The imperial conscience is formed historically, while the image of the empire in the eyes of its people is built during centuries. This includes elements of the foreign policy doctrines for substantiating the imperial policy. It also goes to the adjustment of the conscience to the updated ideological concepts and to the traditional values of the lifestyle in metropolises, which were transferred to the whole empire, etc.
“The imperial conscience has always been changing in time and dynamics and contradictory in content. It changes when the empire changes itself. However, unlike this, the imperial conscience does not die immediately and during a long period of time influences the politics and public opinion in the former metropolis and in colonies. It goes to stable principles, serotypes, arguments about imperial domination that supported the idea of millions of people about the empire,” stated the expert.
“Quo vadis is a Latin expression that means “where are you going?”. In the modern use of the expression, the best definition refers to the Christian tradition of Saint Peter. This appears for several times in the Vulgate version of the Bible. Peter asked: “Lord, where are you going?” Jesus answered him, “Where I am going you cannot follow me now, but you will follow me afterward,” said Igor Boțan.
Historian Ion Negrei, ex-Deputy Prime Minister, said that antique, medieval and modern empires and also contemporary empires are known. This form of organization of the state with multinational structure persisted in time. The greatest empires existed in the antique period, but also in the medieval period. “Sometimes, these medieval empires turned into modern empires. And we also see that the empires can dissolve. At a particular stage, they disappear, sometimes for being replaced with others. Or national states can be formed based on empires, as it happened after World War II. A part of these continue to exist on the political map of the world,” explained the historian.
According to him, the Romanian space has seen empires since the antique period, but these regrettably didn’t develop into a national construct. It goes to the Roman Empire that expanded over the Bessarabian space, over the whole Romanian space and over a part of Europe. “The Roman Empire was a very large empire with great influence that left an imprint of the development of European civilization. Later, the Roman Empire disappeared and our territory in the medieval period became part of another large empire, the Ottoman Empire,” noted Ion Negrei.
He said that during a long period of time, of over 500 years, the Ottoman Empire’s influence witnessed ups and downs. The impact was both positive and negative. “The interests of two empires collided and the declining Ottoman Empire crashed with the Russian Empire in full offensive in our Romanian space. What was their goal? An empire tended to keep the occupied and exploited territories, while the other one tended
to conquer these. The success in the 18th-19th centuries belonged to the Russian Empire that was growing and developing, while the sick Ottoman Empire was fading away,” said Ion Negrei.
According to the historian, each empire tended to extend its territory. For the Russian Empire, the Romanian principalities became a passage corridor for the Russian armies towards new territories. The Russian foreign policy stipulated the goal of reaching the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits. This way, the Romanian territory was the closest for being used to cover this path and to conquer that key entrance to Asia and Europe. In the 18th-19th centuries, the Romanian space became the theater of war between two empires.
Doctor of History Anatol Țăranu, Moldova’s ex-ambassador to the Russian Federation, said that the Romanian principalities in time developed according to the same stages as all the European states did. “During the feudal period, the Romanian space was politically fragmented. A number of entities existed here – the Principality of Moldavia, the Principality of Muntenia or Wallachia. Transylvania was formed under the wing of the Austrian Empire,” explained the historian.
According to him, the problem of these principalities was that they were in a place that from geographical viewpoint can be named the curse of this territory. Since the earliest times of history, this territory has always been struck by a lot of tempests. “Imagine the migration flows that came from the steppes of Asia and were heading for the Balkans, for Europe and ran into the Carpathians, and the only possibility of going further was to enter this narrow corridor between the Black Sea and the Carpathians,” said Anatol Țăranu.
He noted that this was the reason why a material culture comparable with that of Western Europe, in which towns and large constructions were erected in the epoch of feudalism, wasn’t built on this territory in time. Everything was wiped out by those migration flows. In time, when the Romanian principalities started to unite, attempts to build an original culture here, typical of this space and this people, were made, but also amidst the absence of a large state that could defend itself from the external tempests.
According to Anatol Țăranu, when the large empires, including the Ottoman Empire, started to expand, the Romanian principalities found themselves on the border between those big confrontations. “The fact that the Romanians survived in this territory and could keep their cultural entity that later gave birth to a state called Romania is actually a miracle,” noted the Doctor of History.
The public debate entitled “Fate of peripheries of empires. Quo vadis, Moldova?” was the seventh installment of IPN’s project “Impact of the Past on Confidence and Peace Building Processes” that is supported by the Hanns Seidel Foundation of Germany.
Impactul trecutului
See related articles:
- Igor Boțan: Oppressive regime in Transnistrian region speculates on historical factors
- Alexandru Postica: Language problems and economic interests are persistent challenges in Transnistrian region
- Anatol Țăranu: Vulgar Moldovenism born in MASSR continues to live in Moldova’s realities
- Anneli Ute Gabanyi: Moldova has always been of great geostrategic importance for Russia
- Igor Boțan: Moldova’s biggest threat comes from disinformation campaigns
- Ion Valer Xenofontov: Ideas from secret protocol to Soviet-Nazi pact still used today
- Moldova from Ribbentrop-Molotov to Independence. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Soviet’s actions in relation to the Bessarabians in 1940 are ‘occupation” not “liberation”
- Historian Dumitru Lisnic: Soviets brought their own people to Bessarabia for administrative positions
- Anatol Petrencu: Soviets imposed their way of thinking and way of life in MSSR
- Ex-history teacher from Șerpeni: Village in 1944 was completely destroyed
- Effects of Iasi-Chisinau Operation 80 years later. IPN Debate
- Igor Boțan: Soviets’ 1940 actions in relation to Bessarabians were not “liberation”
- Anatol Țăranu: Annexation of Bessarabia on June 28, 1940 was an agreement between two dictators
- Day of June 28, 1940 between celebration and catastrophe. IPN Debate
- Andrei Curăraru: Deportations were aimed at creating society without values
- Lidia Pădureac: Soviet state committed crimes against humanity
- Alecu Reniță: Deportations must keep us vigilant and as far away as possible from Russia - a struggling monster
- Decapitation and uprooting of nation through deportations. IPN Debate
- Igor Boțan: Propaganda must be combated by imbedding critical thinking
- Nicolae Mihai: In totalitarian regimes, citizens no longer enjoy rights and freedoms
- Festive practices and identity engineering in (post)totalitarian regimes. IPN debate
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: In Russia there is an authoritarian regime with totalitarian tendencies
- Igor Boțan: All legislatures in Moldova were pro-European or had periods when they promoted accession
- EU enlargement after collapse of USSR: causes and effects. Moldova’s lesson. IPN debate
- Andrei Curăraru: EU’s ambition is to become an important political center
- Anatol Petrencu: Collapse of Soviet Union was a triumph for countries annexed by force
- Cristian Manolachi: We must discern in avalanche of political messages. 2024 is a complicated election year
- Political mythologies in history and in actuality. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Political mythology in Ukraine war has been exploited to the maximum
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Authoritarian regimes are effective in disseminating propaganda
- Valentin Constantinov: Today we speak Romanian due to verticality of population of Bessarabia in 1812
- Igor Boțan: Literary language and official language are brought to highest level that unites us all
- Vasile Șoimaru: We are Romanians on both banks of the Prut
- Long path home of the Romanian language. IPN debate
- Statements about Russia terrorist attack: Terror breeds only terror
- Igor Boțan: Moldovan authorities must ensure communication with citizens from left bank of the Nistru
- Alexandru Cerbu about war of 1992: Bodies were lying on the streets in Tighina as in Bucha
- Victor Juc: The Nistru armed conflict was caused deliberately
- 32 years of an unfinished war. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Danger of repeat of horrors that society experienced under communist regime still exists
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: We must detach ourselves from Soviet past and build a European society
- History, an international antidote to political repression. IPN debate
- Flori Bălănescu: In the absence of a Nuremberg-type trial, we cannot talk about condemnation of communism
- Alexandru Postica: Victims of political repression receive far too small recompence against terror they went through
- Role of history in forming person and modernizing society. IPN debate
- Igor Botan: You cannot build a future if you don’t know your past
- Ana Bîtcă: By informing students about political repression, we want to avoid repeat of past mistakes
- Igor Boțan: The Gulag was Bolsheviks’ solution for controlling population’s protest movement
- Ludmila Cojocaru: Soviet system meant repression, extermination, enslavement of population
- Lidia Pădureac: The Gulag was used to destroy people’s uprightness
- GULAG phenomenon: genesis, manifestation, lessons. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Budapest Memorandum would have been very important if those who signed it had considered it binding
- Radu Burduja: Ukraine must draw conclusions after signing Budapest Memorandum
- Ion Negrei: Russia no longer enjoys credibility internationally
- Failure of Budapest Memorandum. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Ukraine is key to final Transnistrian conflict settlement
- Natalia Albu: Frozen conflicts mean also a low level of quality of human life
- Octavian Țîcu: Moscow wants Moldova to be Transnistrized
- Frozen conflicts: genesis, dangers, settlement. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Phenomena that occurred in USSR before World War II were typical also for MASSR
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Thousands of people were executed only because they were regarded as a possible source of opposition
- Stalinist repression in MASSR and memory of victims of totalitarian communist regime. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: To better understand how Union of 1918 occurred, we should analyze circumstances in which this occurred
- Alexandru Arseni: Governments in Chisinau and in Bucharest should recognize Union of 1918
- Ion Varta: After Russian Empire collapsed, Romanian national movement evolved into national liberation movement
- Great Union of 1918: lessons for past, present and future. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: When we speak about collapse of Constituent Assembly, we should consider consequences of this for Bessarabia
- Nicolae Enciu: Soviet society was constituted as an antipode of Western society
- Collapse of Constituent Assembly and of chance to democratize Soviet Russia. Effects on country and world. IPN debate
- Anatol Petrencu: In current Russia, there is no democracy
- Igor Boțan: Romania is also obliged to make effort for Moldova to manage to integrate into EU
- Alecu Reniță: Russia is a threat not only to ex-Soviet states, but also to whole Europe
- Igor Șarov: A continuous struggle is led to secure European integration desideratum
- European genealogy tree of Moldova. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Cold War ended because everyone realized what Soviet power actually was
- Ion Valer Xenofontov: Cold War lesson - to win with modesty and to lose with grace
- Anneli Ute Gabanyi: USSR wanted to impose same thinking system on people
- Lessons of Cold War. IPN debate
- Vitalie Stoian: Warsaw Part always intervened inside its borders, not outside them
- Anatol Țăranu: Warsaw Treaty was nothing else but “collective policeman”
- Igor Boțan: Warsaw Pact was a reply to reply
- Warsaw Pact: History without propaganda. IPN debate
- Radu Burduja: NATO was and will remain a successful alliance
- Igor Boțan: Soviet Union became totalitarian and wanted to conquer whole world
- Victor Juc: NATO enlargement occurs at request of states that consider themselves vulnerable
- NATO: History without propaganda. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Russians’ rhetoric on use of nuclear weapons shows that things go bad
- Pavel Moraru: Signing of Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact led to start of World War II
- Mihai Țurcanu: Russia wants to change international order by force
- Truth and lie about beginning of World War II. IPN debate
- Virgiliu Pâslariuc: European development model is a security and prosperity guarantee
- Price and effects of Independence. Comparative study (1877 vs. 1991. IPN debate
- Ion Varta: Russian factor was every time fateful for our national interest
- Igor Boțan: Role of intellectuality in obtaining Independence was prolific
- Ion Negrei: Putsch of October 1917 didn’t enjoy support among population of Bessarabia
- Igor Boțan: We are witnessing third stage of dismemberment of Soviet Union
- Marin Gherman: Communism was a catastrophe for previous century
- USSR: Born and Destroyed by Putsches. IPN debate
- Stalinization and de-Stalinization of Moldovan society. IPN debate
- Ludmila Cojocaru: Keeping memory of Stalinist crimes necessitates effort from state and society
- Igor Boțan: After Stalin’s death, Stalinization is only a kind of phantom
- Florin Abraham: Historical memory cannot be built without state support
- Igor Boțan: Stalinist elites devour each other, this being an essential quality of Stalinism
- Octavian Țîcu: Stalinization – imbedding of a series of features typical of Soviet Union
- Stalinization and de-Stalinization in European context. IPN debate
- Florin-Răzvan Mihai: Putinism poses a big threat
- Ion Manole: Passivity of international community to crimes of communism generated Ukraine war
- Kakhovka Dam: Why are laws and customs of war powerless? IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Possession of nuclear weapon makes Russia ignore international law norms
- Anatol Petrencu: Some nations fight without scruple
- Igor Boțan: Those who took part in deportation of people from Bessarabia were ideologically indoctrinated
- Viorica Olaru: The Kremlin administration is similar to the KGB
- “Stalinist deportations: echo of the past, for present and future”. IPN debate
- Alexandru Postica: Deportations should be treated in a broader context
- Mihail Druță: It is justified to celebrate Europe Day on May 9
- Anatol Țăranu: Moldova cannot become European state by keeping Soviet symbols
- Igor Boțan: It is a big mistake to reveal World War II events that suit only a particular side
- Victory Day: between reconciliation, antagonization and destabilization? IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Acknowledging organized famine is important for learning lessons
- Museographer of Avdarma: 800 people died from hunger in this village in 1946-1947
- Famine of 1946-1947. Vasile Șoimaru: People were dispossessed of everything and were murdered
- Lidia Pădureac: While Moldovan SSR was dying from starvation, Soviet Union was exporting grain
- Organized famine of 1946-1947: victims, murderers, memory. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Fascism, in its milder version, and Bolshevism were heresies of socialism
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Society should be attentive so as not to allow authoritarian-totalitarian deviations
- Alexandru Cosmescu: Fascism, Stalinism and Nazism created external enemies in order to achieve their goals
- What do Fascism, Nazism and Stalinism have in common? IPN debate
- Alecu Reniță on 1903 pogrom: Authorities failed to stop bloodshed
- Pogrom of 1903: executioners, victims and lessons. IPN debate
- Andrei Kushko: Not Moldovans, but imperial functionaries triggered Chisinau program
- Igor Boțan: Chisinau program was an outburst of anti-Semitism in Russian Empire
- Igor Boțan: Accession to EU is alternative to Russian world for Moldova
- Ion Negrei: Moldova should connect to European space for good
- Anatol Țăranu: There are affinities between aggressive policy of Russian empire and current regime of Putin
- Mihai Țurcanu: “Stockholm syndrome” replaced feeling of national identity in many compatriots
- Igor Boțan: Putin’s drama is that he does not have ideology or economic force or army
- Maria Pilchin: Putin teaches his people to die because he was unable to teach them to live
- What did we celebrate and why did we celebrate on February 23? IPN debate