This month marks the 80th anniversary of the end of one of the most important military operations of World War II – the Iasi-Chisinau Operation. For Moldovan society, this is perhaps the most important operation of the entire period of that great war, judging by the direct effects it produced on the current Republic of Moldova, but also on neighboring Romania. It’s true that during 80 years, the significance of that operation has undergone radical changes, depending on the historical data accessible to Moldovan society at different stages, and these, in turn, depended on the interests of the political regimes that governed this space. And this generated and continues to generate different visions of the events dating from 1944. The participants in IPN’s public debate “Effects of the Iasi-Chisinau Operation 80 years later” discussed the effects of the events that happened 80 years ago in the immediate, medium and long terms and the discrepancy in visions and its influence on the country’s present and future.
The permanent expert of IPN’s project Igor Boțan said that History is the study of the past, more precisely of facts and events. The past of humanity and human societies is studied in order to reconstruct them, to discover the main laws so as to use them in order to properly interpret the present and project possible developments in the future. Respectively, historical science uses historical sources, including various narratives, written documents, oral accounts, material artifacts to describe and study the human past and the cause-effect relationships of historical events and facts.
“If we refer to the Iasi-Chisinau Operation, it took place between August 20 and 29, 1944. It was a strategic military operation of the Soviet Armed Forces against Germany and its ally Romania during World War II. The operation is also known in literature as the Battle for Romania or the Second Iasi-Chisinau Offensive. The first operation was not crowned with success for the Soviet Army. The destruction of Army Group South was the objective of the Soviet offensive of the 2nd and 3rd Ukrainian Fronts,” explains Igor Boțan.
According to him, propaganda represents actions carried out systematically in order to spread a political, religious doctrine, etc., theories, opinions, to make them known and accepted, to attract followers. The danger of propaganda is that it is often used to distort real facts in favor of the narratives it promotes.
The president of “Alexandru Moșanu” Association of Historians of Moldova Anatol Petrencu, doctor habilitate of history, said that the year 1944 was a special one on the Eastern Front. “Closer to us, the Iasi-Chisinau Operation was this seventh enumeration. It was “Stalin’s seventh great victory”. By August 20, 1944, when this operation began, the situation in Europe was as follows – the second front in Europe had been opened on June 6. That is, for the Soviets it was a new breather in the fight against Germany. I would also like to mention the uprising of the inhabitants of Warsaw, which began on August 1, 1944. It was the Russians who instigated the townspeople of Warsaw to rise up, but they did not help them and let the Hitlerites destroy this insurrection. So, this was the situation before the Iasi-Chisinau Operation began,” said historian.
Anatol Petrencu noted that the Iasi-Chisinau Operation began on August 20, 1944. “A very important role in the entire military operation was played by aviation. The operation itself began with the shelling of the cities of Iasi and Chisinau. The aviators were Soviet and the planes were both Soviet and American predominantly. Of course, the bombing was very cruel, with destruction, with other disasters,” stated said the president of “Alexandru Mosanu” Association of Historians of Moldova.
Doctor of history Dumitru Lisnic, researcher at the Institute of History of the Moldova State University, lecturer at the Balti State University, said that was is an operation of the 2nd Ukrainian Front and the 3rd Ukrainian Front against the Army Group South Ukraine that included both German and Romanian troops. “The advance plan and the defensive plan of the two sides were strongly affected by the lack of infrastructure. The defense line went along the Eastern Carpathians to the area near Iasi and then passed north of Iasi, Orhei, reaching the Nistru. Of course, the Nistru was not a clear line of defense due to the fact that the Soviets managed to create a bridgehead on the sector between Tiraspol and Răscăieți. So, the big problem was the fact that the Romanian infrastructure at that time could not sufficiently supply the military troops,” stated Dumitru Lisnic, the author of the monograph “The Elites of Soviet Moldova. Recruitment, Informal Networks, Social and Ethnic Identities in Balti, 1940-41; 1944-50”.
According to the researcher, the situation in Bessarabia was even worse and the Soviets managed to advance in the corridor between the Prut and Siret rivers, which was the most vulnerable because further westwards there were the Carpathians, hilly terrain, to the north of Bessarabia there were the forested plateaus, etc. As for the Serpeni bridgehead, it was an advance that practically isolated the armies on the left bank of the Prut, especially the German Sixth Army, which was in the northeastern part of the Romanian-German Flank. “This advance, combined with the advance along the Prut on the right side of this river of the armies of the 2nd Ukrainian Front, led to the taking of many Romanian and German soldiers hostage. And it practically led to a catastrophe in combination with August 23 – the coup d'état. It practically forced the Germans to retreat westwards the Carpathians,” said the doctor of history.
Petru Pasenco worked as a history teacher in Șerpeni village of Anenii Noi district and, after he retired, he worked as a guide at the Șerpeni Bridgehead Memorial Complex. “The Serpeni bridgehead was created during April 12-16, 1944. An attempt was made on April 11 to April 12 to cross the Nistru with the help of rafts and boats. The pontoons were left behind. But the Soviets were greeted by a devastating German artillery fire and gave up. The next day, on April 12, a bridge was built out of empty barrels, beams, etc., opposite the church in Tașlâc village. On this bridge, in the middle of the day, the Red Army soldiers crossed the Nistru River without a shot. Only when they reached the height, from the left-side Șerpeni, did they come across a series of machine guns and the shooting began. For four days, two of the three lines of defense of the German Army were occupied,” related Petru Pasenco.
The former history teacher noted that this bridgehead initially had a depth of 3-4 kilometers, and a length of 7-8 kilometers. This territory included the villages of Speia and Șerpeni and the latter was much larger. The Șerpeni bridgehead was maintained until August 23. “The Șerpeni bridgehead was a bait for the Germans. From Serpeni to Chisinau, there are about 30 kilometers in a direct line, while from Chițcani, the distance was much longer. The Germans also believed that the Iasi-Chisinau military operation would start from there. In fact, the offensive was being prepared from Chițcani, not from Șerpeni, but that territory was defended at any cost. The Soviet soldiers were not allowed to flee across the Nistru. If they tried to, they were shot by Soviet machine gunners. It was defended at all costs to mislead the Germans,” said Petru Pasenco said.
The public debate entitled “Effects of the Iasi-Chisinau Operation 80 years later” was the 40th installment of IPN’s project “Impact of the past on confidence- and peace-building processes”. IPN Agency implements the project with support from the German Hanns Seidel Foundation.
Impactul trecutului
See related articles:
- Igor Boțan: Oppressive regime in Transnistrian region speculates on historical factors
- Alexandru Postica: Language problems and economic interests are persistent challenges in Transnistrian region
- Anatol Țăranu: Vulgar Moldovenism born in MASSR continues to live in Moldova’s realities
- Anneli Ute Gabanyi: Moldova has always been of great geostrategic importance for Russia
- Igor Boțan: Moldova’s biggest threat comes from disinformation campaigns
- Ion Valer Xenofontov: Ideas from secret protocol to Soviet-Nazi pact still used today
- Moldova from Ribbentrop-Molotov to Independence. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Soviet’s actions in relation to the Bessarabians in 1940 are ‘occupation” not “liberation”
- Historian Dumitru Lisnic: Soviets brought their own people to Bessarabia for administrative positions
- Anatol Petrencu: Soviets imposed their way of thinking and way of life in MSSR
- Ex-history teacher from Șerpeni: Village in 1944 was completely destroyed
- Igor Boțan: Soviets’ 1940 actions in relation to Bessarabians were not “liberation”
- Anatol Țăranu: Annexation of Bessarabia on June 28, 1940 was an agreement between two dictators
- Day of June 28, 1940 between celebration and catastrophe. IPN Debate
- Andrei Curăraru: Deportations were aimed at creating society without values
- Lidia Pădureac: Soviet state committed crimes against humanity
- Alecu Reniță: Deportations must keep us vigilant and as far away as possible from Russia - a struggling monster
- Decapitation and uprooting of nation through deportations. IPN Debate
- Igor Boțan: Propaganda must be combated by imbedding critical thinking
- Nicolae Mihai: In totalitarian regimes, citizens no longer enjoy rights and freedoms
- Festive practices and identity engineering in (post)totalitarian regimes. IPN debate
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: In Russia there is an authoritarian regime with totalitarian tendencies
- Igor Boțan: All legislatures in Moldova were pro-European or had periods when they promoted accession
- EU enlargement after collapse of USSR: causes and effects. Moldova’s lesson. IPN debate
- Andrei Curăraru: EU’s ambition is to become an important political center
- Anatol Petrencu: Collapse of Soviet Union was a triumph for countries annexed by force
- Cristian Manolachi: We must discern in avalanche of political messages. 2024 is a complicated election year
- Political mythologies in history and in actuality. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Political mythology in Ukraine war has been exploited to the maximum
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Authoritarian regimes are effective in disseminating propaganda
- Valentin Constantinov: Today we speak Romanian due to verticality of population of Bessarabia in 1812
- Igor Boțan: Literary language and official language are brought to highest level that unites us all
- Vasile Șoimaru: We are Romanians on both banks of the Prut
- Long path home of the Romanian language. IPN debate
- Statements about Russia terrorist attack: Terror breeds only terror
- Igor Boțan: Moldovan authorities must ensure communication with citizens from left bank of the Nistru
- Alexandru Cerbu about war of 1992: Bodies were lying on the streets in Tighina as in Bucha
- Victor Juc: The Nistru armed conflict was caused deliberately
- 32 years of an unfinished war. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Danger of repeat of horrors that society experienced under communist regime still exists
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: We must detach ourselves from Soviet past and build a European society
- History, an international antidote to political repression. IPN debate
- Flori Bălănescu: In the absence of a Nuremberg-type trial, we cannot talk about condemnation of communism
- Alexandru Postica: Victims of political repression receive far too small recompence against terror they went through
- Role of history in forming person and modernizing society. IPN debate
- Igor Botan: You cannot build a future if you don’t know your past
- Ana Bîtcă: By informing students about political repression, we want to avoid repeat of past mistakes
- Igor Boțan: The Gulag was Bolsheviks’ solution for controlling population’s protest movement
- Ludmila Cojocaru: Soviet system meant repression, extermination, enslavement of population
- Lidia Pădureac: The Gulag was used to destroy people’s uprightness
- GULAG phenomenon: genesis, manifestation, lessons. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Budapest Memorandum would have been very important if those who signed it had considered it binding
- Radu Burduja: Ukraine must draw conclusions after signing Budapest Memorandum
- Ion Negrei: Russia no longer enjoys credibility internationally
- Failure of Budapest Memorandum. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Ukraine is key to final Transnistrian conflict settlement
- Natalia Albu: Frozen conflicts mean also a low level of quality of human life
- Octavian Țîcu: Moscow wants Moldova to be Transnistrized
- Frozen conflicts: genesis, dangers, settlement. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Phenomena that occurred in USSR before World War II were typical also for MASSR
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Thousands of people were executed only because they were regarded as a possible source of opposition
- Stalinist repression in MASSR and memory of victims of totalitarian communist regime. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: To better understand how Union of 1918 occurred, we should analyze circumstances in which this occurred
- Alexandru Arseni: Governments in Chisinau and in Bucharest should recognize Union of 1918
- Ion Varta: After Russian Empire collapsed, Romanian national movement evolved into national liberation movement
- Great Union of 1918: lessons for past, present and future. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: When we speak about collapse of Constituent Assembly, we should consider consequences of this for Bessarabia
- Nicolae Enciu: Soviet society was constituted as an antipode of Western society
- Collapse of Constituent Assembly and of chance to democratize Soviet Russia. Effects on country and world. IPN debate
- Anatol Petrencu: In current Russia, there is no democracy
- Igor Boțan: Romania is also obliged to make effort for Moldova to manage to integrate into EU
- Alecu Reniță: Russia is a threat not only to ex-Soviet states, but also to whole Europe
- Igor Șarov: A continuous struggle is led to secure European integration desideratum
- European genealogy tree of Moldova. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Cold War ended because everyone realized what Soviet power actually was
- Ion Valer Xenofontov: Cold War lesson - to win with modesty and to lose with grace
- Anneli Ute Gabanyi: USSR wanted to impose same thinking system on people
- Lessons of Cold War. IPN debate
- Vitalie Stoian: Warsaw Part always intervened inside its borders, not outside them
- Anatol Țăranu: Warsaw Treaty was nothing else but “collective policeman”
- Igor Boțan: Warsaw Pact was a reply to reply
- Warsaw Pact: History without propaganda. IPN debate
- Radu Burduja: NATO was and will remain a successful alliance
- Igor Boțan: Soviet Union became totalitarian and wanted to conquer whole world
- Victor Juc: NATO enlargement occurs at request of states that consider themselves vulnerable
- NATO: History without propaganda. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Russians’ rhetoric on use of nuclear weapons shows that things go bad
- Pavel Moraru: Signing of Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact led to start of World War II
- Mihai Țurcanu: Russia wants to change international order by force
- Truth and lie about beginning of World War II. IPN debate
- Virgiliu Pâslariuc: European development model is a security and prosperity guarantee
- Price and effects of Independence. Comparative study (1877 vs. 1991. IPN debate
- Ion Varta: Russian factor was every time fateful for our national interest
- Igor Boțan: Role of intellectuality in obtaining Independence was prolific
- Ion Negrei: Putsch of October 1917 didn’t enjoy support among population of Bessarabia
- Igor Boțan: We are witnessing third stage of dismemberment of Soviet Union
- Marin Gherman: Communism was a catastrophe for previous century
- USSR: Born and Destroyed by Putsches. IPN debate
- Stalinization and de-Stalinization of Moldovan society. IPN debate
- Ludmila Cojocaru: Keeping memory of Stalinist crimes necessitates effort from state and society
- Igor Boțan: After Stalin’s death, Stalinization is only a kind of phantom
- Florin Abraham: Historical memory cannot be built without state support
- Igor Boțan: Stalinist elites devour each other, this being an essential quality of Stalinism
- Octavian Țîcu: Stalinization – imbedding of a series of features typical of Soviet Union
- Stalinization and de-Stalinization in European context. IPN debate
- Florin-Răzvan Mihai: Putinism poses a big threat
- Ion Manole: Passivity of international community to crimes of communism generated Ukraine war
- Kakhovka Dam: Why are laws and customs of war powerless? IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Possession of nuclear weapon makes Russia ignore international law norms
- Anatol Petrencu: Some nations fight without scruple
- Igor Boțan: Those who took part in deportation of people from Bessarabia were ideologically indoctrinated
- Viorica Olaru: The Kremlin administration is similar to the KGB
- “Stalinist deportations: echo of the past, for present and future”. IPN debate
- Alexandru Postica: Deportations should be treated in a broader context
- Mihail Druță: It is justified to celebrate Europe Day on May 9
- Anatol Țăranu: Moldova cannot become European state by keeping Soviet symbols
- Igor Boțan: It is a big mistake to reveal World War II events that suit only a particular side
- Victory Day: between reconciliation, antagonization and destabilization? IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Acknowledging organized famine is important for learning lessons
- Museographer of Avdarma: 800 people died from hunger in this village in 1946-1947
- Famine of 1946-1947. Vasile Șoimaru: People were dispossessed of everything and were murdered
- Lidia Pădureac: While Moldovan SSR was dying from starvation, Soviet Union was exporting grain
- Organized famine of 1946-1947: victims, murderers, memory. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Fascism, in its milder version, and Bolshevism were heresies of socialism
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Society should be attentive so as not to allow authoritarian-totalitarian deviations
- Alexandru Cosmescu: Fascism, Stalinism and Nazism created external enemies in order to achieve their goals
- What do Fascism, Nazism and Stalinism have in common? IPN debate
- Alecu Reniță on 1903 pogrom: Authorities failed to stop bloodshed
- Pogrom of 1903: executioners, victims and lessons. IPN debate
- Andrei Kushko: Not Moldovans, but imperial functionaries triggered Chisinau program
- Igor Boțan: Chisinau program was an outburst of anti-Semitism in Russian Empire
- Igor Boțan: Accession to EU is alternative to Russian world for Moldova
- Ion Negrei: Moldova should connect to European space for good
- Anatol Țăranu: There are affinities between aggressive policy of Russian empire and current regime of Putin
- Fate of peripheries of empires. Quo vadis, Moldova? IPN debate
- Mihai Țurcanu: “Stockholm syndrome” replaced feeling of national identity in many compatriots
- Igor Boțan: Putin’s drama is that he does not have ideology or economic force or army
- Maria Pilchin: Putin teaches his people to die because he was unable to teach them to live
- What did we celebrate and why did we celebrate on February 23? IPN debate