EaP Think Bridge: EU is still capable of keeping EaP initiative afloat

Print Send by email
06:13, 15 Dec 2017

EaP Think Bridge: EU is still capable of keeping EaP initiative afloat

Before the Eastern Partnership Summit took place in Brussels November 24, every side had its own views, expectations and intentions. However, the Summit results demonstrated that the European Union was still capable of bringing quite a wide range of aspirations to the common denominator and keeping the initiative afloat even if it did not completely satisfy the needs of some participants, wrote EaP Think Bridge.

The publication, to which IPN makes reference, said that the fifth Eastern Partnership Summit was supposed to answer to the main question: how will this EU initiative develop further on? However, more radical wording appeared just before the summit, asking if this initiative was to exist at all, and if it had any added value for the participants?

Brussels decided to keep the initiative, and that is why places at the heart of the current Summit a search for the ways to strengthen cooperation and achieve stronger economy, governance, connectivity and society.

At the current point the Eastern Partnership is a “different speed” initiative, where three countries (Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova) are leading as they are associated states with a free trade zone and visa-free regime, Armenia has a Partnership Agreement, while Azerbaijan has some negotiations, and Belarus is being careful and limits itself to the bilateral and multilateral formats of the EU cooperation.

According to EaP Think Bridge, the aspirations regarding further cooperation are also on the different levels: from the EU membership to a simple mutually rewarding economic cooperation without a political component. This situation is without a doubt understood in Brussels, and therefore a different level of ambitions for the partner countries is declared, however, some attempts are made to avoid the Eastern Partnership fragmentation.

Armenia is one of those few that achieved the desired result at the Eastern Partnership Summit in Brussels. The EU–Armenia Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement was signed, which takes the relations to the next level of the enhanced political dialogue and economic cooperation. This will allow Yerevan to receive more of the European assistance while not deteriorating its relations with Moscow. Many experts suggested that Yerevan and Moscow view this agreement as a bridge between the EAEU and the EU.

Following such a successful example Belarus started to talk about a new format of the relations with the EU. “Signing an agreement on partnership and cooperation is a matter of a short-term perspective,” said the Foreign Minister of Belarus Vladimir Makey.

Azerbaijan had one big goal to achieve at the Summit: that is to raise the question of violating the territorial integrity of the country and the illegal deployment of the Armenian troops on the territory of Azerbaijan. Even though Baku’s position was not entirely reflected in the EaP Summit’s Declaration, however, the Azerbaijani side was satisfied with the results of the summit as its final document supported the territorial integrity of the member states.

Georgia was not overly ambitious over the Eastern Partnership Summit and therefore had a positive reaction to its results. The Georgia’s Prime Minister Giorgi Kvirikashvili underlined that the Georgia’s progress and its successes were unanimously acknowledged, referring to the Association Agreement, FTA and visa liberalization. He also underlined that the European reforms continue to be held in Georgia, and stressed the importance of the time when the EU will be ready to include Georgia into its member states.

Moldova, just as Georgia, did not have any ambitious goals regarding the Summit. Its main task was to achieve continuous financing for its domestic reforms – in October the EU withheld €28m over the justice reform hold-up in Chisinau. Having received the EU’s credit of trust, Chisinau had a positive reaction following the Summit results.

As for Ukraine, it is obvious that it had the biggest demands to the Summit, even though the expectations were quite predictable. In short, the Ukrainian rdemands were as following: a potential EU membership; an investment plan for Ukraine; acknowledging Russia as an aggressor state; new formats for the countries having signed the Association Agreement. Instead of an investment plan there was some sustainable development agenda. Ukraine did not get the results it wanted, and therefore will focus on developing the bilateral relations with the EU. Following the Summit Ukraine’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Pavlo Klimkin tweeted that the “European future is the relations between Ukraine and the EU“, said EaP Think Bridge.

06:13, 15 Dec 2017
IPN: Monitor of Official Gazette, 15.12.2017
The December 15 issue of the O.G. starts with the Law on banking activity (No. 202, October 6, 2017), which was adopted on the Government’s initiative. This transposes several directives…
06:34, 15 Dec 2017

Other news

02 June 2016
RSS
Tiraspol needs talks in 5+2 format more than Chisinau, opinion
01 June 2016
Talks in 5+2 format must focus on three baskets, opinion
free
Polish ambassador: Eastern Partnership laid foundations for modernizing member states
free
Lithuania’s ambassador: United society is needed in European integration process
free
Vita Dobele: Not ministry or Parliament, but country becomes EU member
free
31 May 2016
NGOs concerned about actions of acting prosecutor general in relation to judge
free
30 May 2016
Media NGOs call on Ministry of Interior to investigate case of mistreatment of journalist
free
Country’s European course is in the hands of Moldova and Moldovans, IPN debate
free
27 May 2016
Sergiu Ostaf: Russia implemented same expansion strategy for Moldova and Georgia
free
Eastern Partnership discussed in Brussels: Moldova’s European agenda gets several new ‘contours’
free
Andrei Popov: Plahotniuc prepares his return to politics
free
26 May 2016
Vladimir Plahotniuc wants to improve his image with the West’s assistance, opinions
free
25 May 2016
Is the state abusing the wiretapping mechanism? VIDEO
free
24 May 2016
Vladimir Socor: Ukraine became a shield for Moldova against Russia Moldovan politicians do not know European values, opinions
free
23 May 2016
Verdict of MEPs who visited Moldova: Insufficient thirst for reforms
free
21 May 2016
Petras Aučtrevièius: Political class of Moldova must regain people’s confidence
free
19 May 2016
Germany offers concessions in Chisinau because it cannot obtain them in Tiraspol, opinion
free
18 May 2016
Government pretends to be pro-European, opinions
free
17 May 2016
Percentage of EU supporters decreased through government’s fault, Arcadie Barbarosie
free

ANNOUNCEMENTS

See all

PRESS-RELEASE

News Agency IPN

Public Discussion: Starting position of political parties and potential independent candidates on the pro-unification platform before electoral year

News Agency IPN

Public Discussion: Starting positions of political parties and potential independent candidates on alternative pro-European platform before electoral year

See all

Last videos

Conferințe IPN [HD] | Organizarea adunării de constituire a Grupului de inițiativăConferințe IPN [HD] | Lansarea Manifestului unei Mișcări Civice
Conferințe IPN [HD] |David Davitian este ținut în continuare ostatic, cu încălcarea tuturor legilorConferințe IPN [HD] | Barometrul Opiniei Publice, noiembrie 2017
See all
banner creditex